Re: too many false alarms

Bennett Todd <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:46:55 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2008-01-24T23:04:43 Jon Stearley:
> what false alarm rate do you tolerate for your current monitoring system?  

Monitoring what?

How expensive is a false negative?

How often do real alerts come in?

Failed attacks on a successfully-hardened server, as long as you
know the accuracy rates you can deduce the stats which are all care
about.

If missed alerts are enormously expensive and alerts come in no
oftener that once a week, it could be that a 300% false positive
rate would still be fine.

If you're keeping a desk of 50 people racing full-time and are
neglecting real alarms because you can't keep up, a 2% false
positive might be worth a lot of engineering effort to tighten
things down that much more.

-Bennett

_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHmTF+HZWg9mCTffwRAtUKAKDArmdBHnXGQdWGPNcJwrjkZAfipgCeMp8O
6YHCw0QRcHS8x/4SVL1GT1U=
=V2vh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----