RE: SYSLOG patent?
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:15:15 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <577465F99B41C842AAFBE9ED71E70ABA308BBC@grfint2.intern.adiscon.com> |
I intended not to get angry about that junk patent again... but... The problem, as usual, is it's broad scope. Depending on what "similar methods" are, rsyslog's compressed record transmission mode may also be now patented by Huwaii. It uses an invalid syslog header to indicate compression on a per-message level... oops, no, no wrong... When supporting compressed messages, it doesn't use syslog protocol at all but instead a proprietary protocol whose first byte means: "<" - this is a syslog message and "z" - this is a compressed message... What a mess... Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:loganalysis- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Balazs Scheidler > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 5:22 PM > To: Stefano Zanero > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [logs] SYSLOG patent? > > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 12:18 +0100, Stefano Zanero wrote: > > A Ananth wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > European Patent EP1881668 published on 01/23/2008 is > > > entitled "THE METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR > > > TRANSFERRING SYSLOG MESSAGE" and assigned to Huawei > > > > > Anyone care to comment on the implications? > > > > It seems to me that the "invention" is "let's add a signal which > > automatically makes the syslog receiver switch to a secure channel". > > > > Am I reading it wrong ? > > > > I'd describe it as a STARTTLS for syslog. Although not directly > specified in the IETF RFC drafts, this is trivial. > > EPO should not have accepted that. STARTTLS is specified in a wide > variety of other protocols (pop3, imap, ldap, etc...) > > -- > Bazsi > _______________________________________________ > LogAnalysis mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis