Re: What OTHER info is most useful for log analysis?
"Anton Chuvakin" <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:30:11 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As I promised to tell the list, the analysis of this poll is posted: http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2008/06/logging-poll-8-analysis-needed-log.html On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Anton Chuvakin <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > Usually I don't bother the esteemed list members with my polls (e.g. > see http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/search/label/poll), but with this one > I MUST 'cause this is where the quality of source information counts > :-) > > The poll is about what context information is most useful when > analyzing logs: > http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2008/05/poll-8-log-analysis-context.html > (or direct voting link: http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/337525 ) > > BTW, I am saddened that I have to add this, but here I go: if you are > a vendor with an agenda to skew the poll results to somehow point to > your product, please don't. Really, don't! :-) > > Best, > -- > Anton Chuvakin, Ph.D., GCIA, GCIH, GCFA > http://www.chuvakin.org > http://chuvakin.blogspot.com > http://www.info-secure.org > -- Anton Chuvakin, Ph.D., GCIA, GCIH, GCFA http://www.chuvakin.org http://chuvakin.blogspot.com http://www.info-secure.org