Re: QA failures - holding the release
"Nathan Scott" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.pcp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Mark, ----- Original Message ----- > I've not yet been able to resolve the following QA failures on F24/x86_64. > Some just need some QA work (e.g. the nfsv4 related), others need better > filtering. But some are not understood (by me anyway). I'm concentrating on > the pmrep segfaults before tackling any others for now. > > Failures: 042 216 232 366 651 732 755 766 782 798 895 1069 > > 042 no values available for proc.memory.rss in busybox container > (other metrics are OK) > (passing for me) > 216 network metrics out of range (0..0). Issue with version of netstat on > F24? > > network.icmp.inerrors = 152 out of range 0..0 > > network.icmp.outechos = 612 out of range 0..0 > > network.tcp.outsegs = 6703507 out of range 0..0 > > network.tcp.retranssegs = 77259 out of range 0..0 > > network.tcp.inerrs = 7440 out of range 0..0 > > network.udp.noports = 226 out of range 0..0 (passing for me) > 232 torture indom, fetch != pmGetInDom for nfs4.client.reqs > nfs4.client.reqs: > number of instances from unprofiled fetch (0) != that for pmGetInDom (56) This is now fixed. > > 366 logconf for jbd2 > $ rpm -qf $(pwd)/jbd2 > file /var/lib/pcp/config/pmlogconf/filesystem/jbd2 is not owned by any > package > ... hmm so how did it get there? Left over from a previous install? Dunno, don't think so - not sure I recognize that file. > 651 sample PMDA IPC protocol failure (passing for me) > 732 nfs4.server.reqs has 11 additional entries on fc24 (allocate, copy, > copy-notify, etc) Fixed now. > 755 no apache agent? (passing for me) > 766 > pcp://10.64.152.4:44321 > > pcp://10.64.152.4:44321 (passing for me) > 782 pmwebd not terminating in a timely manner .. forced to terminate) (passing for me) > 798 nfs value filtering? nfsclient, I haven't got to this one yet, maybe Lukas can take a look overnight - very likely to be fallout from a recent merge. > 895 oops, 100 archive records not between the expected range of 300 and 1500 Yep, failing for me too - same way. This is a new test - Ken, is this known? > 1069 python, pmrep segfaults > $ pmrep -s 1 --archive archives/20130706 -z -O 30m > disk.dev.read,,"'sda','sdb'",,,16 > d.d.read d.d.read > sda sdb > count/s count/s > N/A N/A > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > must be segfaulting somewhere in the C libraries? > (passing for me) cheers. -- Nathan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- pcp mailing list [email protected] https://groups.io/g/pcp/messages -=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14691): https://groups.io/g/pcp/message/14691 View All Messages In Topic (2): https://groups.io/g/pcp/topic/3119244 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/3119244?uid=174580 New Topic: https://groups.io/g/pcp/post Change Your Subscription: https://groups.io/g/pcp/editsub?uid=174580 Group Home: https://groups.io/g/pcp Contact Group Owner: [email protected] Terms of Service: https://groups.io/static/tos Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/pcp/leave/354243/563757577/xyzzy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-