Re: Need a generic "ls" QA filter?

On 13/02/17 20:42, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Seeing a repeating pattern here of some tests with 'ls' output not
> matching expected output.  Some of this I think is captured in the
> _filter_ls function of 738 - shall we make this generic and extend
> with some of the other (esp. permissions) inconsistencies?
>
> See attached .bads for all the ones I'm seeing that seem to be all
> related to these ls output quirks.

Nathan,

I think my latest round of commits fix these ... but yes, a generic ls 
filter probably would be useful (although these ones are already heavily 
filtering the ls output).


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15136): https://groups.io/g/pcp/message/15136
View All Messages In Topic (1): https://groups.io/g/pcp/topic/4363518
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/4363518?uid=174580
New Topic: https://groups.io/g/pcp/post
-=-=-
pcp mailing list
[email protected]
https://groups.io/g/pcp/messages
-=-=-
Change Your Subscription: https://groups.io/g/pcp/editsub?uid=174580
Group Home: https://groups.io/g/pcp
Contact Group Owner: [email protected]
Terms of Service: https://groups.io/static/tos
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/pcp/leave/354243/563757577/xyzzy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-