Re: Correlated situation overhead on ITM HTEMS

I've got to agree - this should REALLY be done in Omnibus or Impact, James.
And you can set up all kinds of self service possibilities (look at the MWM
implementation in Impact for one example, and you can copy and modify that
easily to create a notification subscription service, for example).

Frank - from my phone
On Mar 14, 2013 5:34 PM, "John Alvord" <jalvord-r/[email protected]> wrote:

> Be very wary...
>
> TEMS Storage Growth and Correlated Situations
> http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21579095
>
> Regards,
>
>
>   *John Alvord* - Ph: 1-720-396-2788    Cell: none
> Customer Support - Tivoli Software - *jalvord-r/[email protected]*<[email protected]>
> Advisory Engineer - Tivoli Monitoring - ITM infrastructure
> Follow us on Twitter! *@Tivolisupport* <http://twitter.com/TivoliSupport>and
> *Facebook* <https://www.facebook.com/IBMTivoliSupport>
> Personalize your support needs with the *IBM Support Portal*<http://www.ibm.com/support/electronicsupport/>
> Use *Service Request*<http://www.ibm.com/software/support/servicerequest/quick_start.html>to get assistance!
> For emails regarding a PMR, copy *[email protected]*<[email protected]>
> For secure browser uploads: *https://www.ecurep.ibm.com/app/upload*<https://www.ecurep.ibm.com/app/upload>
> For Customer Support guidance: *IBM Software Support Handbook*<http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/sas/f/handbook/home.html>
>  <http://twitter.com/TivoliSupport>
>
>
>
>
> From:        "Redus, James E CIV DISA CSD (US)" <
> [email protected]>
> To:        "Discussion list for Tivoli product and Tivoli Ready
> products." <[email protected]>,
> Date:        03/14/2013 02:12 PM
> Subject:        [TME10] Correlated situation overhead on ITM HTEMS
> Sent by:        [email protected]
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi List.
>
> A question came up recently about the growing number of ITM Correlated
> Situations running in our environ. These SITs run on the HTEMS, and we’d
> like to know if they consume a significant amount of HTEMS resources, and
> if so, what is a reasonable number to have running? Currently we have about
> 2 dozen correlated SITS.
>
> I would think that since correlated SITs are based on a comparison of
> true/false values from other SITs, that the HTEMS is probably not sifting
> thru much data and could handle a pretty good number of these.  We have a
> pretty healthy 24-CPU, 16GB mem Sparc Solaris HTEMS, with a load avg that
> rarely goes above 2, and about 6400 OS agents in the environ (ITM 622, FP5).
>
> Any experiences running a large number of correlated SITs?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> -James
>
>  _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>
>

_______________________________________________
TME10 mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe:[email protected]