Re: ITM 6 Agentless deployments

Jay Slay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.tivoli.general
Message-ID <56A08E85-0B4E-41E5-932D-60FC3D7AEDDC__22839.0602198944$1370702433$gmane$org@gmail.com>
Thanks John,

I did see the 32767 char limit that was "fixed".  I will be doing this on ITM 6.3.0.1.
I would be more concerned that a large number of monitored agents like that would either be unstable or perhaps lag a bit behind on data collection.  
I was hoping someone out there had been down that road already and found a good set of tuning parameters (if any exist).

We don't use situation actions for much of anything aside from restarting windows services and probably a few small scale custom things that I have already forgotten about…


On Jun 7, 2013, at 6:21 PM, John Alvord <jalvord-r/[email protected]> wrote:

> For a long time the rule was the the list of names with spaces needs to be 32767 bytes. I remember folks that would reduce the size of the names to squeeze in a hundred more subnode agents. Typical maximums are 800-1000 agents. Really bad news if you exceed it because the TEMS will crash. If you have a relatively small number of targets, no problem. 
> 
> However, from ITM 623 FP2 and ITM 630 GA the limit  was relaxed. The APAR is 
> 
> IV16083 TEMA            623 3   SUBNODE LIST LENGTH LIMITATION FOR TIVOLI MONITORING AGENTS 
> 
> http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV16083 
> 
> Note that this is an Agent side update... typically this means you need to update the OS Agent to that level or higher... and the TEMS needs to be at that level or higher. 
> 
> Anyway, that is the way things should work. 
> 
> One interesting issue to watch out for, if you have lots of sub-node agents and you recycle the agentless agent server - then all the sub-node agents will be marked offline at that moment. If you have an MS_Offline type situation with an action command, you will run all that action command at once. I have seen TEMS failures from exactly this condition since all commands run at the same time. To dodge that issue - like if you were installing maintenance or changed configuration - you have to just stop the hub TEMS for the duration. Of course if you don't have action commands, just a flood of MS_Offline events go true and later false when they come back. 
> 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
>  
> 
> John Alvord - Ph: 1-720-396-2788    Cell: none 
> Customer Support - Tivoli Software - jalvord-r/[email protected]
> Advisory Engineer - Tivoli Monitoring - ITM infrastructure
> Developer Blog - Wonderful World of Situations
> Follow us on Twitter! @Tivolisupport and Facebook
> Personalize your support needs with the IBM Support Portal
> Use Service Request to get assistance!
> For emails regarding a PMR, copy [email protected]
> For secure browser uploads: https://www.ecurep.ibm.com/app/upload
> For Customer Support guidance: IBM Software Support Handbook
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        Jay Slay <[email protected]> 
> To:        "Discussion list for Tivoli product and Tivoli Ready products." <[email protected]>, 
> Date:        06/07/2013 10:54 AM 
> Subject:        [TME10] ITM 6 Agentless deployments 
> Sent by:        [email protected] 
> 
> 
> 
> Hey guys...just pinging to get a feel for agentless deployment limitations.  We may be looking to deploy a moderate amount of agentless for windows, aix, Solaris, and Linux  (several thousand monitored servers) and wondering who out there is using them and what if any gotchas you hit along the way.  How many monitored servers per agent, any env variable tuning used, etc.  we have several agentless agents deployed as it is, but only for older OS versions that require too much patching to run a full blown OS agent....maybe several dozen.  If we expand this list, I don't want to hit anything that could be avoided if possible...documentation on subnode limitation seems a bit lacking... I assume it is a very situational type of subject.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -JKS
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]

_______________________________________________
TME10 mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe:[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.