Re: [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations

saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.tivoli.general,gmane.comp.sysutils.tivoli.tme10
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the info.
I also used the same formula, (100- Idle%), to get the CPU usage. But this output is different than optium report. Now my manager is asking me to explain the difference between ITM and optium report. I'm using SMP CPU attributes . Is there any issue with this?
(AIX system has 20 cores.)
 
Regards
Sebastian
 

________________________________
 From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]>; Discussion list for Tivoli product and Tivoli Ready products. <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
  


I agree w/Jared about the superior metrics from the PX agent, especially as it regards true core usage--((sys % + user %)/100) * Num of Physical Cores--but from the sar report comparison I did with out AIX admins UX's CPU Busy % attribute tracked well over time.  I think the CPU Busy % is akin to (100 - Idle %), or put another way, very close to  (User %+ System %+ IO Wait%) from what I recall.




On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:36 AM, saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]> wrote:

Hi List,
>I want to elaborate the scenario.
>As per SLA if CPU utilization is more than 70% for a sustained period of 15 mintues then it is a breach. So which CPU attribute will help me to acheive this? Can anyone guide me on this? 
> 
>Agent OS -- AIX
>ITM -- 6.2.3 FP3
>Report -- custom cognos report 
>
>Regards
>Sebastian 
> From: saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]>
>To: Discussion list for Tivoli product and Tivoli Ready products. <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 6:28 PM
>
>Subject: Re: [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
>  
>
>
>Thanks Jared. 
>  
>I'm using 6.23 FP3 and have to generate CPU reports for SLA (>70%). CPU Busy (percent) is breaching most of the times and we did a comparison with optim . Optim shows 40% when CPU Busy is 70% in ITM. So I want to know for SLA reports which attribute is best? What is the purpose of following attributes? 
> Avg CPU Busy 5 
>CPU Usage 
>  
>Regards 
>Sebastian 
>
> 
>From: Jared Seaton <[email protected]>
>To: saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]>; Discussion list for Tivoli product and Tivoli Ready products. <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 6:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
> 
>
>
>I find that on AIX, it is best to use either the AIX Premium agent, or Unix OS Agent 6.2.3 FP2+ and monitoring Entitlement metrics, over standard Unix CPU metrics.  We have situations that monitor the Entitlement Used Pct, and Phys Busy Pct attributes of the AIX Premium agent. 
>
> 
>The AIX metrics were introduced into the Unix OS Agent at 6.2.3 FP1, but I found too many issues at that level, and wouldn't recommend it. 
>
>
>
>
>------ 
>Jared Seaton 
>
> 
>twitter.com/jmseaton
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:15 AM, saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Hi, 
>>  
>>I'm facing almost same issues in CPU utilization (AIX ). Which is the correct attrribute to analyze CPU utilization? 
>>Polling interval is 5 mints and  I used CPU Busy (percent) attribute. But when I compare with optim / topaz reports,  ITM is showing higher values (almost double). 
>>There are multiple attributes available with the agent. Which one to use , I'm confused . Can anyone help me?  
>>  
>>Avg CPU Busy 1 
>>Avg CPU Busy 5 
>>Avg CPU Busy 15 
>>CPU Busy (Percent) 
>>CPU Usage 
>>  
>>Regards 
>>Sebastian 
>>
>> 
>>From: "Hetter, Larry" <[email protected]>
>>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>>Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:43 AM
>>Subject: [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
>> 
>>
>>
>>I am running ITM 6.2 FP2 using some of the built-in CPU situations for the SMP CPU attribute group on AIX boxes.  When I go to the System Information and System Details screen in TEPS, CPU ultization does not always seem to reflect the same things that the sar command and topas command show when they are run on the same box.  The internal CPU Situation using the Average CPU Busy Attribute Item also occasionally fires when other indicators on the box do not reflect high CPU utilization.   
>>
>>Has anyone else noticed this? 
>>Does anyone know the behind the scenes commands used by TEPS to determine CPU utilization? 
>>
>>Thanks. 
>>
>>Larry Hetter 
>>CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield 
>>UNIX Systems and Event Management 
>>410-880-6543 
>>[email protected] 
>> 
>>******************************************************************************** 
>>Unauthorized interception of this communication could be a  
>>violation of Federal and State Law. This communication and  
>>any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain 
>>protected health information. This communication is solely 
>>for the use of the person or entity to whom it was addressed. 
>>If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution, 
>>printing or acting in reliance on the contents of this message 
>>is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message 
>>in error, please notify the sender and destroy any and all copies.  
>>Thank you. 
>>******************************************************************************* 
>> 
>>_______________________________________________
>>TME10 mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TME10 mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>mailto:Unsubscribe%[email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TME10 mailing list
>[email protected]
>Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>
>   
>_______________________________________________
>TME10 mailing list
>[email protected]
>mailto:Unsubscribe%[email protected]
>
>


-- 
"Sometimes I think that's the only right thing to do:
To dream. to live in the world of dreams.
But it doesn't last forever--wakefulness always comes to take me back..."

_______________________________________________
TME10 mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe:[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.