| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.sysutils.tivoli.general,gmane.comp.sysutils.tivoli.tme10 |
| Message-ID |
<CAMzJ2Pr-0VdkedR=8fvVzjNt9kOaExHfUJwwmWD211J2MPoikA@mail.gmail.com> |
I agree w/Jared about the superior metrics from the PX agent, especially as
it regards true core usage--((sys % + user %)/100) * Num of Physical
Cores--but from the sar report comparison I did with out AIX admins UX's
CPU Busy % attribute tracked well over time. I think the CPU Busy % is
akin to (100 - Idle %), or put another way, very close to (User %+ System
%+ IO Wait%) from what I recall.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:36 AM, saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi List,
> I want to elaborate the scenario.
> As per SLA if CPU utilization is more than 70% for a sustained period of
> 15 mintues then it is a breach. So which CPU attribute will help me to
> acheive this? Can anyone guide me on this?
>
> Agent OS -- AIX
> ITM -- 6.2.3 FP3
> Report -- custom cognos report
>
> Regards
> Sebastian
> *From:* saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]>
> *To:* Discussion list for Tivoli product and Tivoli Ready products. <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 6:28 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
>
> Thanks Jared.
>
> I'm using 6.23 FP3 and have to generate CPU reports for SLA (>70%). CPU
> Busy (percent) is breaching most of the times and we did a comparison with
> optim . Optim shows 40% when CPU Busy is 70% in ITM. So I want to know for
> SLA reports which attribute is best? What is the purpose of following
> attributes?
>
> Avg CPU Busy 5
> CPU Usage
>
> Regards
> Sebastian
>
> *From:* Jared Seaton <[email protected]>
> *To:* saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]>; Discussion list for Tivoli product
> and Tivoli Ready products. <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 6:13 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
>
> I find that on AIX, it is best to use either the AIX Premium agent, or
> Unix OS Agent 6.2.3 FP2+ and monitoring Entitlement metrics, over standard
> Unix CPU metrics. We have situations that monitor the Entitlement Used
> Pct, and Phys Busy Pct attributes of the AIX Premium agent.
>
> The AIX metrics were introduced into the Unix OS Agent at 6.2.3 FP1, but I
> found too many issues at that level, and wouldn't recommend it.
>
>
> ------
> Jared Seaton
>
> twitter.com/jmseaton
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:15 AM, saby <sabyantony2001-/[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing almost same issues in CPU utilization (AIX ). Which is the
> correct attrribute to analyze CPU utilization?
> Polling interval is 5 mints and I used CPU Busy (percent) attribute. But
> when I compare with optim / topaz reports, ITM is showing higher values
> (almost double).
> There are multiple attributes available with the agent. Which one to use ,
> I'm confused . Can anyone help me?
>
> Avg CPU Busy 1
> Avg CPU Busy 5
> Avg CPU Busy 15
> CPU Busy (Percent)
> CPU Usage
>
> Regards
> Sebastian
>
> *From:* "Hetter, Larry" <[email protected]>
> *To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2009 12:43 AM
> *Subject:* [TME10] [ITM62] Internal CPU Utilization Situations
>
> I am running ITM 6.2 FP2 using some of the built-in CPU situations for
> the SMP CPU attribute group on AIX boxes. When I go to the System
> Information and System Details screen in TEPS, CPU ultization does not
> always seem to reflect the same things that the sar command and topas
> command show when they are run on the same box. The internal CPU Situation
> using the Average CPU Busy Attribute Item also occasionally fires when
> other indicators on the box do not reflect high CPU utilization.
>
> Has anyone else noticed this?
> Does anyone know the behind the scenes commands used by TEPS to determine
> CPU utilization?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Larry Hetter
> CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
> UNIX Systems and Event Management
> 410-880-6543
> [email protected]
>
>
> ********************************************************************************
> Unauthorized interception of this communication could be a
> violation of Federal and State Law. This communication and
> any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain
> protected health information. This communication is solely
> for the use of the person or entity to whom it was addressed.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution,
> printing or acting in reliance on the contents of this message
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
> in error, please notify the sender and destroy any and all copies.
> Thank you.
>
> *******************************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> mailto:Unsubscribe%[email protected]<Unsubscribe%[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TME10 mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:[email protected]
>
>
--
"Sometimes I think that's the only right thing to do:
To dream. to live in the world of dreams.
But it doesn't last forever--wakefulness always comes to take me back..."
_______________________________________________
TME10 mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe:[email protected]