Re: Question about CheckForLibrary function in configure script
Giuseppe Sacco <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:47:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.telephony.fax.hylafax.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1265791631.12232.93.camel@scarafaggio> |
Il giorno mar, 09/02/2010 alle 21.15 -0500, Aidan Van Dyk ha scritto: [...] > Is there really a system where you don't need -lutil? well, no. I was investigating this problem: when compiling on linux I always get a warning about faxgetty being linked against libutil even if the binary is not loading any symbol from the library. So, I removed the LIBUTIL part from faxd/Makefile, and faxgetty was working anyway. Then, I found that on freebsd, faxgetty was not working anymore. I now find, that the problem is not libutil, but faxgetty itself: on linux it uses GettySysV.c++ that doesn't uses libutil, while on BSD it uses GettyBSD.c++ that require libutil. So, probably, configure should check about libutil only when GETTY is BSD and not when GETTY is SysV. Bye, Giuseppe ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Developers Mailing List ____________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe [email protected] < /dev/null