Re: CLA Update (Requires Resigning)

"Joshua C. Colp" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.devel
Message-ID <CAM0A2Z068X5QPYeB8wRsr2dyWvMdzdx9G8twuTvCkvWuGxTtZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:37 AM Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> thanks for the update, the old patent phrase was indeed quite broad,
> noticed that during review. This should capture the intent better.
>
> I understand that it needs re-signing. Does this also mean that the old
> CLA is now voided for all organisations/people that signed it previously
> from a contractual point of view?
>

No, it is not voided.


>
>
> Just a suggestion, maybe it would be advantageous in case of future major
> changes to the CLA to have a quick review session with the community
> before, like on this list. Just as a chance to save the different involved
> parties some time and effort.
>

I'll take this into consideration if it occurs.

If there are ever concerns regarding the CLA as it stands, send me an email
and I can loop in the appropriate party from Sangoma legal to discuss.

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Asterisk Project Lead
Sangoma Technologies
Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.