On 10/9/2023 5:11 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:31 PM <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/2023 5:26 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
> > I would have to look deeper again but my kneejerk was this
> sounds like
> > "nightly" to me. Just chiming in quickly
>
> Yeah, it has the right connotation, though it might imply that these
> builds are put out more frequently than they really are... "monthly"
> would be more accurate at that.
>
>
> I would prefer "testing" as the name. Generally we don't refer to
> things as "stable" or "unstable", and involving dates in any way such
> as "monthly" is inviting people to ask "why hasn't this been updated?
> it's been a month". The release process is in Github and the repo, so
> a PR can be made to add such a thing by anyone. Once done we could
> update the website. I would not advise changing things such as sending
> it to Github for download, the bandwidth from the downloads server
> isn't a problem.
Sounds good, I thought this might have involved more on the backend. I
submitted a PR to the CI repo in the only place I found any reference to
the -current suffix, so hopefully that does the trick.
When you say "update the website", are you referring to the downloads
server or the documentation (which is now also in Git)?
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.