Re: Mailing List Future
Michael Maier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello! I can fully agree with what you have written. 100% Thanks Michael On 04.12.23 at 13:52 [email protected] wrote: > I strongly object to not having an asterisk-dev list. Mailing lists are essential > for FOSS developer discussion. The majority of non-ephemeral development > discussion happens either on IRC or here on the asterisk-dev list - just check the > archives to see that it's still active. Most of us are not on the community forums > and/or couldn't be bothered to use them. You can go and see now that "Development" > on the community forums is basically dead, because nobody wants to use it, so > trying to push that on everyone is a terrible idea. > > Even for users, I think the loss of asterisk-users will be a major loss. Far more > *discussion* is happening on the Discourse forum, but far more *quality* > discussion still happens on asterisk-users. Being on a mailing list seems to be a > natural weedout for junk questions. More serious questions still seem to come > through on the mailing list. The community forums is far fuller of useless > postings from people who can't tell a hard drive from a memory stick. Nobody wants > to wade through a bunch of low-quality posts to find the few that might have some > use. Thus, getting rid of asterisk-users would see a significant drop in the > average quality of user engagement. But at least, even if the -users list is > dropped, the -dev list should stick around in some form. > > I know the forums can have emails enabled that you can receive, and no, that's not > a proper replacement for a mailing list. > > GitHub Discussions aren't a proper mailing list, either, so ultimately I think > that will run into the same issue. GitHub has a lot of bells and whistles but most > of them aren't as built out as using the proper tool they try to emulate. > > I think #3 is the right choice. It's using the right tool for the right job. If > you don't want to maintain the lists, have somebody else do it. I do a combination > of hosted and self-hosted for my own lists. Contrary to the opinions of some, > people, especially technical people, have not "moved on" from mailing lists; they > are widely used, and I get hundreds of emails a day from them that I have a good > workflow for. > > Most lists I'm on that used to be elsewhere (e.g. Yahoo Groups, Google Groups, > mailman, LISTSERV, other custom or independent platforms) have now migrated to > groups.io and are generally highly satisfied with it compared to other platforms. > It used to be completely free; it's now free for lists under 100 members, or ones > that are grandfathered in. As the maintainer of several lists there and a member > of many more, I've been pretty happy with it. > > I'd suggest creating a list there and letting people on this list manually opt > into it, since there are probably a lot of people on mailman that aren't active > anymore. If it's under 100 members, it's completely free anyways. If more than 100 > people join, that means people here *really* like mailing lists and find value in > them, and I'm sure Sangoma can afford $20 a month for it, if it really doesn't > want to run mailman lists anymore that badly, and $20 is a small price to keep > developers happy. > > NA > > On 12/4/2023 7:28 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> My 5c. Killing the dev list is a bad idea. >> >> Most developers could not care about having to poll forums. It also means that >> stuff that would previously get an audience will now get none. >> >> github discussions are better than forums at least. >> >> May I inquire as to the problem you're having with the ML? Perhaps I might be >> able to assist ... >> >> Kind regards, >> Jaco >> >> On 2023/12/04 14:00, Joshua C. Colp wrote: >> >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> Over the past few years, the use of the Asterisk mailing lists has diminished, >>> with far more conversation happening on the Asterisk community forums[1]. The >>> state of email, to ensure reliable delivery, has also gotten more complicated - >>> emails get caught by spam filters, etc.. To continue the mailing lists would >>> require a huge time and resource investment, for minimal use. >>> >>> To that end, we’ve decided to discontinue the mailing lists effective February >>> 1st, 2024. >>> >>> This means the following: >>> >>> 1. Sending and receiving mailing list emails will no longer be possible. >>> 2. The list archives, however, will remain available. >>> >>> We need to decide the future of the asterisk-dev mailing list; specifically, >>> where to hold discussions in the future. There are a few options: >>> >>> 1. A “Development” category exists on https://community.asterisk.org/ already >>> that can be used. >>> 2. We can use GitHub discussions, which keeps things with the GitHub project. >>> 3. We can use a hosted mailing list elsewhere. >>> >>> We suggest option #2, since it keeps things with the GitHub project, which is >>> where everything development-related happens now regardless. This has been set >>> up and enabled already. >>> >>> If you have any input, now is the time to state it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- >>> Joshua C. Colp >>> Asterisk Project Lead >>> Sangoma Technologies >>> Check us out at www.sangoma.com <http://www.sangoma.com> and www.asterisk.org >>> <http://www.asterisk.org> >>> >> >> > > -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev