Re: Confbridge for 80 devices
Jerry Geis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABr8-B5RT9SVnBrPePYENpGpf9LjvZPtxwgnGU1F-GuaefAVCg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:53 PM Jerry Geis <[email protected]> wrote: > Bringing 80 devices into a conf bridge with CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 > 1045T Processor at 2.7G and audio is reported as staticy or not the best > audio quality. > > Network is r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: RTL8168e/8111 > Link is 1G. > > Asterisk 18.14.0 > > I would think this should be able to handle 80 calls (one way audio). > > How can I tell if asterisk is an able to handle this - or how can I find > the bottle neck? > > Thanks > > Jerry > So I did the "timing test" got timing test Attempting to test a timer with 50 ticks per second. Using the 'timerfd' timing module for this test. in modules I added [modules] autoload=yes preload => res_timing_dahdi.so preload => res_timing_pthread.so Re-ran the timing test got the same thing. Notice it says specifically timerfd - not timing_dahdi or timing_pthread. System is CentOS 7. lsmod | grep dahdi lsmod | grep dahdi dahdi_transcode 14291 1 wctc4xxp dahdi_voicebus 59241 1 wctdm24xxp dahdi 228002 9 wctdm24xxp,wcaxx,dahdi_transcode,oct612x,dahdi_voicebus,wcb4xxp,wct4xxp,wcte43x,wcte13xp crc_ccitt 12707 2 wctdm24xxp,dahdi Is my timing OK - or not ? Note /var/log/asterisk/messages says "nothing" about timing even though the resourse were loaded. Thoughts ? Jerry -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users