Re: New documentation

Dominik Wa=C3=9Fenhoven schrieb:

> 1) Introduction
> 2) Installation
> 3) The styles
>     (i.e. the different bst files: jurabib, jureco, jox, jurunsrt, and
>     maybe the jurabib.mbs)
>     not a detailed description, maybe just a bibtex entry with the four
>     different outputs in standard configuration
> 4) Additional BibTeX entry types and fields
>     i.e. @periodical,@www,@commented ...
>     shortauthor,shorttitle,titleaddon,booktitleaddon ...
> 5) Package Options
>    5.1) Citation formatting
>    5.2) Bibliography formatting
> 6) The Commands
> 7) Customization
> 8) The Configuration file
> 9) Across the boundaries

Sounds good.

> a) jbendoc.tex and jbgerdoc.tex stay as they are, and the new=20
> documentation files get new names (though I had no good ideas until now,=
=20
> at least none with only 8 characters...)

I want to suggest to abandon the german documentation. What do you think=20
of this?
It would be more easy to maintain - somewhat hard for some users, but it=20
is luxury to support two different documentations. I just wanted to ask=20
for it ;-)

Jens
--=20
Die wenigsten, die nichts sagen, schweigen.              www.jurabib.org




=20
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jurabib-developer/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
=20