Re: Re: Re: Footcite formatting

Charles de Miramon schrieb:

>  > I never got any response to that message, so I imagine the patch wasn't
>  > absorbed into the official jurabib source code. Jens, did you decide it
>  > wasn't appropriate, or just not have time to look at it?

The time is the main problem. In the meanwhile jurabib became a 
sourceforge project - without any code uploaded yet (dont know how to it 
:-).
If you would contribute - you're welcome as a developer!

> The patch looks nice but maybe should be expanded for the jurabib common bst
> style.

Based on the patch mentioned above, I have implemented a new option 
`nopublisher', which can have three values:

`nopublisher=cite' (same as only `nopublisher' or `nopublisher=true'),
`nopublisher=bib'
`nopublisher=both'

It should work with all jurabib styles, but has to be tested more 
extensively.

> I have sadly no time to learn BibTeX programming now, even if it does not
> look very complicate.
> 
> I think the question is whether the jurabib package should evolve by piling
> up options. Somebody may want tomorrow the publisher name in the fullcite
> but not in the bibliography ! Or, evolve towards the creation of a tool to
> generate custom .bst file.

The best solution IMO is the development of a generic jurabib.mbs file 
fo makebst.tex as mentioned in the plans for jurabib.

Greetings,

Jens
-- 
Die wenigsten, die nichts sagen, schweigen.              www.jurabib.org



-- 

Please remember -- this is an international english speaking mailing list!

If you have a problem, please provide a complete minimal example document (with a small bibliography database), which runs out of he box without any superfluous packages loaded, otherwise we could not help. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jurabib/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/