Re: \setupheadnumber question

Florent Michel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.context
Message-ID <CALOhoeKwDPnvFSEJiicVwDU+kRmG7xdEF3Wt2zzSSOdcX_EwbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

In case it helps, the output looks consistent with the wiki with the
following change in strc-sec.mkxl (line 1322):

  \permanent\tolerant\protected\def\setupheadnumber[#1]#*[#2]% todo: reset
if at other level
-   {\setstructurenumber{\thenamedheadlevel{#1}}{\number#2}}
+  {\setstructurenumber{\thenamedheadlevel{#1}}{#2}}

(But I am, by far, not familiar enough with the code to know if this
change would have negative effects.)

Cheers,
Florent

Le sam. 21 mars 2026 à 14:23, Jim <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> the wiki says
>         If the second argument is signed, the heading’s number will be
>         increased or decreased by the specified amount instead.
>
> However, that is not what happens for numbers with a leading '+'.
>
> For example, in
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> \starttext
> \section{First}
> \section{Second}
> \section{Third}
>
> \setupheadnumber[section][+10]
> \section{Plus 10}
>
> \setupheadnumber[section][-4]
> \section{Minus 4}
>
> \setupheadnumber[section][+3]
> \section{Plus 3}
>
> \setupheadnumber[section][+1]
> \section{Plus 1}
> \stoptext
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> The output is (blank lines removed, editorial comments added)
>
> 1 First
> 2 Second
> 3 Third                      <so far so good>
> 11 Plus 10                   <huh, '+10' acted like '10'>
> 8 Minus 4                    <that subtracted 4, then with +1 it is
> correct>
> 4 Plus 3                     <nope, should have been 12 (or 11).>
> 2 Plus 1                     <nope>
>
>
> Q: is the wiki wrong, or
>    is there a bug in the code, or
>    am I misinterpreting the wiki sentence?
>
> (I don't think I am misinterpreting the wiki, but I have to admit the
> possibility.)
>
> If the code is right and the wiki is wrong, then +N is the same as N, which
> seems like a lost opportunity and (arguably) a bit surprising.
>
> Would someone be so kind as to give me a definitive answer?
>
> Thanks.
>                                 Jim
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : [email protected] /
> https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
> webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
> archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
> wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : [email protected] / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.