Re: \setupheadnumber question
Wolfgang Schuster <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.context |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 21.03.2026 um 21:43 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
> On 3/21/2026 8:24 PM, Jim wrote:
>
>> They currently are. But as Florent points out, a very small change fixes
>> this. But should the change be made?
>
> you know the answer ... wolfgang has to check if it fits in the
> interface (consistency, interference, etc)
The currrent entry is
\setupheadnumber [.1.] [.2.]
1 SECTION
2 [-+]NUMBER
and unless a count register is expected as argument dropping \number
shouldn't be a problem.
Another option is to add a + check (no need to check for -):
\permanent\tolerant\protected\def\setupheadnumber[#1]#*[#2]%
{\setstructurenumber{\thenamedheadlevel{#1}}{\ifhastoks{+}{#2}+\fi\number#2}}
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________