Re: bibliography with certain canonical reference
Denis Maier via ntg-context <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.context |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jean-Pierre I also think it would be great if context-sbl were part of the distribution, but that poses maintenenace questions A module might be more appropriate. Regarding this: > have begun experimenting in that direction as well, still within ConTeXts native publications architecture rather than by creating a separate bibliography processor What do you mean with creating a separate bibliography processor? Also, Im very much interested in the bibliographic infrastructures, so if theres anything where I might be of any help, count me in. Best, Denis Von: Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context <[email protected]> Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. August 2026 13:15 An: [email protected] Cc: Jean-Pierre Delange <[email protected]> Betreff: [NTG-context] Re: bibliography with certain canonical reference Hi Hraban, Yes, I think this is a very reasonable suggestion. I am currently writing several chapters on bibliography for ANSS-CE, and I have in fact just completed Draft No. 1 of that part. This work led me to test context-sbl quite extensively. For the moment, it remains an external module, and these tests also brought me into contact with its author, Joe McCollum, as well as with Kirk Lowery, who has considerable experience with biblatex and complex bibliographic modelling. There seem to be two related questions here. First, I agree that integrating the SBL module into the ConTeXt distribution could be a very good thing. At the same time, my recent tests suggest that there is still a little work to do before the module can really be considered optimal. I have found a few small points that could be improved, especially in some of the less common cases involving ancient texts, canonical references, multilingual material, and related bibliographic structures. Whether context-sbl should become part of the distribution is of course something for Hans and Joe to decide. If that is not desirable, then restructuring the repository so that it can be installed and updated as a normal ConTeXt module would already be a substantial improvement. There is also, I think, a second and more general direction worth exploring. LMTX now provides very powerful facilities for Unicode, scripts, language handling and bidirectional typesetting. It might therefore be possible to make better use of these native capabilities for genuinely complex bibliographies complex not because bibliography is conceptually exotic, but because it is never entirely simple to typeset a single bibliography containing, for example, Arabic, Hebrew, Syriac, Greek, English, German, Russian, transliterations and translations, while keeping the bibliographic style itself coherent.* I have begun experimenting in that direction as well, still within ConTeXts native publications architecture rather than by creating a separate bibliography processor. The idea is to distinguish, for example, the original-script form of a title from its transliteration and translation, while leaving ConTeXt/LMTX responsible for the actual script, font, language and direction handling. I would be happy to help test any reorganization of context-sbl, and I would prefer not to fork Joes project independently without first discussing it with him. Best, JP * See here a PDF of such a test. Le 17/08/2026 à 09:10, Henning Hraban Ramm a écrit : Am 17.08.26 um 06:31 schrieb Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context: I use specifications such as APA or Chicago myself, and I think they are very good tools for ordinary bibliographic work. But I would still encourage you, when you have the opportunity, to experiment with | context-sbl|. SBL see <https://github.com/jjmccollum/context-sbl> https://github.com/jjmccollum/context-sbl Wouldnt it make sense to include the SBL style in the distribution? If not: Could the author (or maintainer) please restructure the repository so that we can make it installable as a module? (Of course we could fork and change it accordingly. I dont really want to do it myself, since I never needed a proper bibliography.) Hraban ____________________________________________________________________________ _______ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] / <https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl> https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : <https://www.pragma-ade.nl> https://www.pragma-ade.nl / <https://context.aanhet.net> https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : <https://github.com/contextgarden/context> https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : <https://wiki.contextgarden.net> https://wiki.contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________________________ _______ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________