Re: Sizes of TL distribution
Zdenek Wagner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC1phyYRc7m-vTTkyf4k2KX12ACXKGqdPr_90_gaLE6Bc8-=sw@mail.gmail.com> |
út 20. 1. 2026 v 10:04 odesílatel Arthur Rosendahl <[email protected]> napsal: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 10:57:59AM -0700, Max Chernoff via tex-live wrote: > > The schemes are essentially just random ad-hoc collections of packages > > (Karl, please correct me if I'm wrong here), but after writing TLC3, > > scraping arXiv for the accessibility package status table, and dealing > > with various user support requests over the years, you probably have a > > much better idea of which packages are commonly used than we do. So if > > you're willing to give us a list of packages, we'll gladly update one of > > the schemes or create a new one to contain only those packages. > > I once asked the people from VTeX (https://vtex.lt/) for such a list > from the documents they process, I think it was in 2017. I can dig it > up if you want. > Some people think that the most rapidly software is the best but for me it is opposite, rapidly changing software is for me unstable and the same document will not compile a few years later. I keep old versions of TL for exactly that purpose, but if my document has to be compiled by another persou who does not store 10+ versions of TL, it will be a problem. My zwpagelayout was not modified for many years because it contains everything what I need. Package xetex-devanagari is very old and unchanged for years but people still use it. Velthuis Devanagari is even older and no longer developed but still in use. > Best, > > Arthur Zdeněk Wagner https://www.zdenek-wagner.eu/