Re: Sizes of TL distribution
Don Hosek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMDtpNQmEg_7bJ5nNyhFUkXcXS9Zw8BZb=cvUwcS-9Lm=DKQJw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Jan 20, 2026 at 17:45:08, Frank Mittelbach < [email protected]> wrote: > Am 20.01.26 um 23:55 schrieb Christopher Dimech via tex-live: > > > > > >> TeX Live needs to have a small basic config + curated collections > > >> (e.g. Core Latex Collection) that can be easily added and installed. > > >> A small core install that resolves without dependency hell. A two-tier > > >> solution to leverage what Frank described. > > > > > > as TLC scheme wouldn't fit that bill, it is curated, but it doesn't > attempt to be 100% dependency free, that isn't really possible without > too much restrictions at least at this point in time. > > Take for example , the different main classes: article, KOMA and memoir. > article is used by many other classes as the basis and there a a large > number of packages that are there for extending article with features. > Many of them are not compatible with KOMA or memoir because they have > their own methods for this. But that doesn't mean you should only add > one of the classes > > Maybe I missed something, but I would define dependency-free to mean that if package X requires package Y and package X is part of the collection than package Y must also be part of the collection, and not that any two packages should work together. On the fonts front, I think at the very least the AMS math fonts should be included as part of such a core collection (since they would be a dependency of amsmath which seems an obvious inclusion). -dh