Re: hitex format 2026
David Carlisle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEW6iOjw-7SqMqhOY3UwcaXmf+YskJLS1dJhh7wiiZ6tDc-JeQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 at 22:00, Karl Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > David, Ulrike, all - thanks for the reports. What to do is up to > Martin. I already reported the failures in hitex/hilatex fmt building to > him and disabled the building in the sources (hitex.tlpsrc). > > So, Ulrike, I don't know why any hitex-related fmt was still trying to > be built for you. If that's what was happening. Ulrike had a local fmt configuration that caused it to build (or rather not build) > If hitex.fmt is going to > stay disabled for a while, I'll update the news. > > David, it is not simple to reduce the hyphenation files being > read. Right now hitex is sharing the same plain-related hyph setup as > all the other engines, which loads all the hyph patterns. I am not > enthused about changing that. Martin said the problem is not just how > many are loaded, but that the "Church Slavonic" hyph-cu.tex hyphenation > file (and maybe others, didn't go beyond that) uses Unicode chars which > are intentionally not supported. --thanks, karl. > Yes if you comment out Church Slavonic, then later hyphenation files fail. (I wanted to build a plain format for testing so I stuck \endinput half way down language.def, but I realise that's not an option for a distributed solution...) This is really a similar issue to the latex failure, the utf-8 handling means that you can't use the classic 8-bit code paths. but the Unicode support isn't enough to handle Unicode in any reasonably small update to the xetex or luatex code paths. David