Re: PNG loading time
Norbert Preining <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aYsSfLgrYm_CTXaT@fettsack> |
Hi Hartmut, > it's writepng.c in pdftex, which is very restrictive regarding "PNG > copy": Yes, I have found that, send Karl a patch to activate the debug logging (the if (0) ...) on demand via env vars. Checks for fast embeddability is pngcheck -v | grep -P 'RGB\+alpha|gAMA|sRGB|cHRM|iCCP|sBIT|bKGD|hIST|tRNS|sPLT|alpha|(?<!non-)interlaced' (maybe ;-) > $ convert x.ppm x.png # PNG copy skipped because: cHRM bKGD It works when doing magick IN.png -alpha off -strip +profile '*" OUT.png or pngcrunch -rem alla -rem gAMA -rem sRGB -rem cHRM -rem iCCP \ -rem sBIT -rem bKGB -rem hIST -rem tRNS -rem sPLT \ -force IN.png OUT.png I feel that the magick command was the fastest, but I might be wrong. > When using ImageMagick convert to generate a PNG file, this tool will > add cHRM and bKGD chunks (without need?), then it's slow. Netpbm See above. > The code p_png.c by Thomas Merz, from which "PNG copy" was gleaned, > supports also palette and does so by added code. But this was not > implemented in writepng.c (likely due to laziness). Interesting, PDFLite library code, right? > Now, experimentally allowing also palette for "PNG copy" without adding > special palette chunk code in writepng.c seems to produce valid PDFs > with palette info! :-) Unclear, why, risky. Adding "fast" palette copy Is this depending on the PDF version used? Do later PDF versions have more support for different (in particular RGBA is very common!)? > PNGs. Room for improvement... Indeed. And a **huge** time win if implemented. Best regards Norbert -- DI Dr Norbert Preining https://www.preining.info arXiv / Cornell University + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13