Re: installer misidentifies illumos OS
Carson Chittom <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:40:04 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/9/26 16:17, Karl Berry wrote: > Thanks. So that should provide enough information to distinguish. But > really it would be best to make the change in config.guess. Do you have > any idea of whether there would be problems with other software if > config.guess started returning -*illumos2.11 and *omnios2.11? > > It would be good to bring it up on [email protected]. It's > surprising to me that no one has brought up the problem before. It makes > me think that mostly it works to pretend illumos is solaris-2.11. I am very far from an expert here, but my understanding is that you are right and it still mostly does work to treat one as the other--providing you are compiling things from scratch (which config.guess is mostly used for in other places, right?). > Or maybe we should drop all Solaris binaries -- I wonder if anyone is > even using current TL on Oracle Solaris. > > Do you (or anyone) have any sense of how many people might be using > native TL on Oracle Solaris vs. potential users on illumos? I don't know, I'm afraid. But as I think I mentioned in another message, OmniOS does provide a TL installation, so presumably there's *some* use.