Re: CrossRef utils in TL'26 are broken
Boris Veytsman <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Apr 2026 19:06:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Paulo Ney As Karl said, maybe we should move this discussion elsewhere. In the case some people here use crossrefware, PNdS> From: Paulo Ney de Souza <[email protected]> PNdS> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 22:21:31 -0700 PNdS> ------ PNdS> @BOOK{Aigner:first, PNdS> title = {Proofs from {THE BOOK}}, PNdS> author = {Aigner, Martin and Ziegler, Günter M.}, PNdS> isbn = {9783662223437}, PNdS> lccn = {98034262}, PNdS> publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, PNdS> address = {Berlin/Heidelberg}, PNdS> year = {1998}, PNdS> edition = {1}, PNdS> langid = {english}, PNdS> pages = {viii+199}, PNdS> } PNdS> ------ PNdS> and the utilities bibmradd and bibdoiadd fail silenty PNdS> and return and empty number. PNdS> bidzbladd fails more drastically: 1. bibmradd works for me. Could you please run it in debug mode (as bibmradd -d) and catch the output? Please put it as a comment in the github issue Karl opened. 2. bibdoiadd seems to fail for books, but work for inproceedings and articles. I need to investigate why. 3. bibzblmath is a sad story. Zbmath seems to add a check whether the query is generated by a robot, and the script fails. I blame the AI trainers that scrap internet without ethical (or any) constraints. My own sites are constantly hit by these robots. Well, these are the times we live in... -- Good luck -Boris