Re: omitting collection-fontsextra installation by default? (RFC)
Don Hosek <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jun 2026 07:39:03 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMDtpNR4OH8o5FQ_CZcVLOZeMtMc8TGKNoCHhBZjkpBktTQFYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000005ee6ca065563be4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think maybe splitting fontsextra into two parts, with the Asian fonts in a separate package might make sense. It=E2=80=99s been a while since I did = an analysis but I think after documentation the Asian fonts were the biggest users of space in TeX live (and they might have also contributed to the size of the documentation as well). On Jun 29, 2026 at 07:00:10, Bruno Voisin <[email protected]> wrote: > Vincent Goulet then Karl Berry wrote: > > > I suspect many other journal classes would stop working with a TeX Li= ve > > > update, with authors left in the cold. > > > Yes, that would be bad. I can check how many fonts are involved. > > > Same here: the journal class I=E2=80=99m using most (from Cambridge Unive= rsity > Press) calls newtxtext and newtxmath, which belong in Karl=E2=80=99s list= ing of > collection-fontsextra. > > This wasn=E2=80=99t always like that: up to July 2020, the class was usin= g > Computer Modern. In July 2020, they switched to New TX. > > Bruno Voisin > --0000000000005ee6ca065563be4b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"> <font face=3D"ui-sans-serif, sans-serif">I think maybe splitting fontse= xtra into two parts, with the Asian fonts in a separate package might make = sense. It=E2=80=99s been a while since I did an analysis but I think after = documentation the Asian fonts were the biggest users of space in TeX live (= and they might have also contributed to the size of the documentation as we= ll).=C2=A0</font><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmai= l_signature"><br></div></div><br> </div> <br> <div class=3D"gmail_quote"> <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Jun 29, 2026 at 07:00:10, Brun= o Voisin <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&g= t; wrote:<br></div> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;bor= der-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" type=3D"cite"> =20 <div> <div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> Vincent Goulet then Karl Berry wrote:<br></b= lockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> <br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"c= ite"> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0I suspect many other journal classes would st= op working with a TeX Live<br></blockquote><br><blockquote type=3D"cite"> u= pdate, with authors left in the cold.<br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"c= ite"> <br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> Yes, that would be bad. I= can check how many fonts are involved.<br></blockquote><br>Same here: the = journal class I=E2=80=99m using most (from Cambridge University Press) call= s newtxtext and newtxmath, which belong in Karl=E2=80=99s listing of collec= tion-fontsextra.<br><br>This wasn=E2=80=99t always like that: up to July 20= 20, the class was using Computer Modern. In July 2020, they switched to New= TX.<br><br>Bruno Voisin </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> --0000000000005ee6ca065563be4b--