Re: omitting collection-fontsextra installation by default? (RFC)
Vincent Goulet <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:29:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Le 22 juill. 2026 =C3=A0 17:00, Karl Berry <[email protected]> a = =C3=A9crit : >=20 > For native TL, the best solution would be to have some sort of dynamic > package loading a la miktex. Implementing that is not going to happen > any time soon, if ever = (https://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/bugs/?668#comment0). I don't have an account to post on the bug tracker, so will post it = here: Although on the fly updates of MIKTeX look cool and imply a smaller = initial footprint, I still prefer the TeX Live way of doing things. = First, you're always sure (or at least confident) to have everything you = need at hand even without network access (it still happens not so = infrequently!). Second, I've seen a number of times students using = MIKTeX blocked and puzzled that their compilation was hanging simply to = discover that the confirmation pop-up was silently waiting for input = hidden behind another window. Man I feel old posting "don't change a thing" messages, but I always = very much stood behind the TeX Live way ever since I started using it, = back when teTeX got deprecated. Cheers, v.=