Re: Epstopdf and Lucida fonts in labels
Larry Siebenmann <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:47:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.metafont |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Laurence F.
It seems to me that your reply does not address the issue of
robust font integration. But rather the issue of getting a
well-framed "eps" file.
Inversely, my reply addressed the font issue and neglected the well
well-framed and structured "eps" issue.
Together we have hopefully indicated all Maurizio needs.
Incidentally, I favor using TeX label overlays rather than the
MP label mechanism because they apply uniformly to all sorts
of graphics from all sorts of sources. I use more bitmapped
graphics than vectorial. Furthermore, the font storage for TeX
label overlays is optimally efficient; it is often attrocious
when labels are included in autonomous figure files.
Cheers
Laurent S.
PS. Thanks for the specifics on the dvips "papersize" \special
and the -i option.
PPS. The issue of well-framed and well-structured "eps" files
can be otherwise resolved by opening (fontless) MP output
files into Adobe Illustrator and resaving in a suitable format
(".pdf" included!!). Last time I checked, this workaround
failed on MP labels.