Re: Epstopdf and Lucida fonts in labels
Taco Hoekwater <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:02:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.metafont |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Laurence Finston wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > To summarize: > The problem is converting the EPS produced by MP to other > formats. ImageMagick's `convert' can't convert it to PNG > and I'm fairly sure that `ps2pdf' can't convert it to PDF > (not double-checking these things, either). If you are not interested in investigating available solutions, you can of course invent your own. But clearly you have not read the PostScript manuals, or you would not have to use new vocabularies like 'standard postscript' to express the semantic entity Adobe calls 'Encapsulated PostScript [File]' or EPS[F], for short. Greetings, Taco PS You are aware of the fact that PostScript is not what you would call 'free', right? It is just as proprietary as PDF; both being designed, published, copyrighted, trademarked and controlled by Adobe Inc.