Re: Local repository
Jeff Barnett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.miktex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ulrike Fischer wrote, On 9/3/2014 1:17 AM: > Am Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:43:55 -0600 schrieb Jeff Barnett: > >> I recently installed MikTeX (full) on a new machine. I started by >> downloading files to a local repository from the network then the >> installer used that repository to do the actual system install/build. >> >> Is there any good reason to keep the local repository and/or is there >> any harm in deleting it? Its size is approximately 1.66GB. > If you installed everything from the local repository it doesn't > harm to delete it if you need the space. But I would first check in > the package manager(s) if they use the local repository and in this > case switch to an online repository. There's an implication from your response that I want to check. I think you are saying that on-the-fly package installation could happen using the local repository. Is that correct? If so why does the repository not get updated when I use the MikTeX updater? It seems that the on-the-fly facility, using local repository, could pick up a seriously outdated package. I have almost 8TB of growing room so I'm not worried about the repository because I'm squeezed for space; rather, I hate leaving big gobs of data laying around and not knowing in a couple of years whether it's vital or not. GB's have a habit of hiding in mysterious places and reproducing. I checked the repository manager and saw no check marks. So I think I'll tell it to use the net and get rid of the local stuff. Thanks. -- Jeff Barnett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/