Re: Betatesting NEXT
Ulrike Fischer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.miktex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:54:35 +0200 schrieb Dr. Dietrich Grau: > Hallo Ulrike, > > thank you for helping a non-texpert again! > > Since I wrote "Betatesting NEXT" and was speaking of a bug in LuaTeX 0.95 it > seems to me that it was quite clear that I use LuaTeX 0.95.0, MiKTeX 2.9 > NEXT and the packages therein, that is: I'm beta testing texlive 2016 and had at least already three luatex update. Also math in luatex can be done with legacy math and with unicode-math which makes quite a difference. Beside this: Even if the example document is obvious: By providing it anyway you make it easier for other to run a fast (and comparable) test. I can reproduce the problem also in context and wrote a question on the luatex list. -- Ulrike Fischer http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Q: How can I leave the mailing list? A: See http://docs.miktex.org/faq/support.html#leavingml