Re: Correction to pdftex-a.pdf

Gernot Hassenpflug <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.pdftex
Message-ID <CAN0dEZxfakcitOzJRL+EtSQOZ-Sxk0+cyOUbCuoD=vsCf=b57g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Karl Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Gernot,
>
>     Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:01:30 +0900
>     ...
>     "If the fontflags field is not given, pdfTEX treats it as being 4, a
>     symbolic font."
>     Problem: 4 is script font, symbolic font is 3 according to Table 3.

Hello Karl,

> Coming back to this: actually, both the documentation and the code are
> correct, if not a model of clarity. Table 3 shows bit positions, not
> decimal values. The decimal value "4" means that bit position 3 is set
> -> symbolic font.

Whew, sorry I could not grok that correctly, thanks for checking that.
Glad to know it is correct, and that it is merely my comprehension
that was faulty.

> What was omitted from the manual is that this is the default for
> embedded fonts. For non-embedded fonts (not that anyone should be using
> those), the default is 0x22.
>
> I added a few more words of description.  --thanks, karl.

Many thanks! It is tough work to put out a manual (also tough to read
it, from a different viewpoint), very happy I could help to improve it
even just a little.
Best regards,
Gernot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.