Re: \tracinglostchars
jfbu <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:08:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.pdftex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ross, Le 15 févr. 2021 à 21:14, Ross Moore <[email protected]> a écrit : > … and all this extra noise would just turn off most users anyway. > > Serious users, who are aware of how useful the .log file really is, > should have the ability to make adjustments for themselves. > > You can always put the directive: > \tracinglostchars2 > in your preamble. > It doesn’t need to be a LaTeX default. I mentioned LaTeX, which was my mistake because it was not a latex question on this why I did not address it to the latex team ; however it is relevant to LaTeX as typically LaTeX produces tons of log output what I was trying to say is that both \tracinglostchars1 and \tracinglostchars2 are lacking imho in usefulness because, whether to terminal or to the log, their output might easily go unnoticed, and it is very important indeed what they try to tell the user sure, if you get a whole bunch of 20 of them in a row, you might see them in console output, but if you have only one such warning and are building a 200 pages document which nowadays is faster than 20 years ago, the stdout stream flashes bye so quick, you might not see it hence my query for a stronger behavior which would be to add to both stdout and the log file a one-line warning at end of run either that, or a \tracinglostchars3 which would trigger that it would match then with some other of etex report mechanisms Thanks, Jean-François