***SPAM*** Re: [Dev-luatex] features request 2
Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach-mA33O8PENLSoClj4AeEUq9i2O/[email protected]> Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:35:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.luatex.user,gmane.comp.tex.luatex,gmane.comp.tex.pdftex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 02.09.21 um 16:18 schrieb Linas Stonys: > wow! Indeed there is a lot useful primitives (\ifempty, ifrelax, ... > often would be used I'm not sure that syntactic sugar (ie commands that are trivial to implement) is something that should be added to the engines but the two you suggested, ie gaining control at the very start of paragraph processing and just before a group ends, are two things that the engines really don't offer unless you totally disable most of the processing and figure out for yourself when it would be time to switch to hmode (which while theoretically doable is not really a practical option). As both have useful applications (and should be fairly easy to provide in all engines those are two that I think are worth pursuing my 2cents - Frank
SpamAssassinReport-comedy_dante_de.txt
(text/plain, 1.3 KB)
Spam detection software, running on the system "comedy.dante.de",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Am 02.09.21 um 16:18 schrieb Linas Stonys: > wow! Indeed there
is a lot useful primitives (\ifempty, ifrelax, ... > often would be used
I'm not sure that syntactic sugar (ie commands that are trivial [...]
Content analysis details: (9.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 USER_IN_BLOCKLIST_TO User is listed in 'blocklist_to'
10 USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_BLOCKLIST_TO
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
-0.7 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A)
0.4 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS