Re: pdftex Digest, Vol 184, Issue 2
Doug McKenna <doug-Nf2trSL5CZG0AFT+FuuGOlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Mon, 27 Mar 2023 05:32:29 -0600 (MDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.pdftex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1853984176.11638722.1679916749305.JavaMail.zimbra@mathemaesthetics.com> |
Yesterday I wrote:
>| Isn't "px" the CSS unit for one pixel, with unknown size?
>| Or, if printing, 1/96th of a PostScript ("bp") point?
Sigh. I meant to say "in" instead of "bp", which is what I said further in my post. Proofreading error, but perhaps the same error as the initialization code in the engines, if it's that. It's real easy to make. I don't know; prior to a couple of days ago, I had not heard of "px" as a typesetting unit.
The <https://www.w3.org/Style/Examples/007/units.en.html> web page I cited expressly says (when printing, not on a screen):
>| In fact, CSS requires that 1px must be exactly 1/96th of an inch in
>| all printed output. CSS considers that printers, unlike screens, do
>| not need to have different sizes for px in order to print sharp lines.
>| In print media, a px thus not only has the same visual appearance from
>| one device to another, but indeed it is measurably the same.
Doug McKenna