Packaging designed by the TeX community (was: new teTeX beta (20040208))
Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:32:09AM +0100, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > BTW., Linux distributors usually split teTeX into packages. I don't > think that anybody is able to do this reliably unless he is a TeX > guru or something like that. I agree, teTeX is a very big system and packaging needs expert knowledge, that only few have. > Recently a friend of mine had a problem (not RedHat specific). He > installed all the packages except context. The problem is that if you > use LaTeX and Metapost, you need at least two files which are part of > context. Would it make sense to launch a small packaging tetex project, that would design the possible segmentation and cross-dependencies of teTeX components? The results could be used by rpm/deb packagers to various degrees of granularity according to the distribution's policy. > I don't use one of the mainstream Linux distributions, so I don't know > how they split teTeX into pieces. I even don't know why. There are some reasons, the dependencies on perl, perl-Tk and the texinfo etxraction have already been raised here. For my personal use I prefer a complete teTeX setup, but for packaging projects requiring only docbook support while building in chroots, having all of teTeX as a build requirement is quite a big overhead. -- [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAOl+OQBVS1GOamfERAgbkAJ4rf81UXnAgS+IUA9Bai4m2MiaGUwCfe956 ziDIfqR049uJ0g2tFfnh7r4= =HeMH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----