Packaging designed by the TeX community (was: new teTeX beta (20040208))

Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:32:09AM +0100, Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
> BTW., Linux distributors usually split teTeX into packages.  I don't
> think that anybody is able to do this reliably unless he is a TeX
> guru or something like that.

I agree, teTeX is a very big system and packaging needs expert
knowledge, that only few have.

> Recently a friend of mine had a problem (not RedHat specific).  He
> installed all the packages except context.  The problem is that if you
> use LaTeX and Metapost, you need at least two files which are part of
> context.

Would it make sense to launch a small packaging tetex project, that
would design the possible segmentation and cross-dependencies of teTeX
components? The results could be used by rpm/deb packagers to various
degrees of granularity according to the distribution's policy.

> I don't use one of the mainstream Linux distributions, so I don't know
> how they split teTeX into pieces.  I even don't know why.

There are some reasons, the dependencies on perl, perl-Tk and the
texinfo etxraction have already been raised here. For my personal use
I prefer a complete teTeX setup, but for packaging projects requiring
only docbook support while building in chroots, having all of teTeX as
a build requirement is quite a big overhead.
-- 
[email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAOl+OQBVS1GOamfERAgbkAJ4rf81UXnAgS+IUA9Bai4m2MiaGUwCfe956
ziDIfqR049uJ0g2tFfnh7r4=
=HeMH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.