Re: test for t1lib version fails

Thomas Esser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 11:27:52PM +0400, Michail Vidiassov wrote:
> Yes, it fixed problems for me.
> 
> libs/t1lib/t1lib.ac has one more (tiny) bug.

Ok, thanks. I have fixed both problems in t1lib.ac and recreated all
configure scripts.

> Configuring --with-x-toolkit=motif results in a warning message from
> texk/web2c/configure about an unknown toolkit.

texk/kpathsea and texk/xdvik have both their own version of xt.ac.
For top-level, I have decided to use xdvik's version. I agree that it
would be desirable to resolve the conflicts.

>  Why cm-super fonts package is not included?

It would almost double the size of the compressed texmf tarball.  And:
the lm fonts are included. They are not autotraced and of a better
quality. They don't contain as many glyphs, but give them a chance
(\usepackage{lmodern}). Maybe, that's just what you need...

Thanks again,

Thomas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.