Re: [preview-latex-devel] dvipng 1.1 in teTeX 2.96.4

On Jun 28, Jan-Åke Larsson wrote:

> Harald Koenig wrote:
> > 1)
> > OSF1 v4.0 and SunOS 5.5.1 don't have neither stdint.h nor inttypes.h.
> > 
> > I've added tests in configure for stdint.h and inttypes.h
> > and some fallback code if neither file is available.
> 
> This is also true for VC++, used for MIKTeX. *But* I'd expect something like
>   font.c:89: error: `uint64_t' undeclared (first use in this function)
> So I would like to add (the equivalent of)
> 
> typedef long long                int64_t;
> typedef unsigned long long      uint64_t;

in my testing version I had those lines included too -- and I just removed 
them before I wrote the report, thinking "noone needs int64_t in dvipng ..."
just to realize  lateron, that compilation fails without 64bit-types :-(

sorry for that confusion  (never post a untested/modified patch;-)



Harald Koenig
-- 
"I hope to die                                      ___       _____
before I *have* to use Microsoft Word.",           0--,|    /OOOOOOO\
Donald E. Knuth, 02-Oct-2001 in Tuebingen.        <_/  /  /OOOOOOOOOOO\
                                                    \  \/OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\
                                                      \ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|//
Harald Koenig                                          \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
science+computing ag                                    //  /     \\  \
[email protected]                            ^^^^^       ^^^^^


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com