Re: 2.96.4 --with-x=no

"Steffen R. Knollmann" <[email protected]> wrote:

>   I certainly don't want to bother anyone :-) it's just that I
> (unknowingly as I am) assumed that with using the no-x switch the
> package really doesn't have any dependencies on X (that blows with the
> t1lib) and knows about this (there is no point in looking for anything
> xdvi-related since it is not build in the first place). But well, easy
> to say for me :-) I'll try to understand the interworkings there a bit
> more before I put for more wise comments.

I don't know about the t1lib issue, but the texconfig problem is simply
because of 

test -f $xdvi_app_file || {
  exist_test -f "$TC_DFT_XDVI_APP" "app-default file for xdvi"

  cp $TC_DFT_XDVI_APP $xdvi_app_file
  chmod u+w $xdvi_app_file
  $TC_MKTEXUPD $xdvi_app_dir XDvi
}

in lines 1875ff. After some function defining, the script processing
starts in line 1730 with "begin: initialization", it's not too hard to
work one's way until the point where it fails.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie