Re: teTeX-2.0-rc1: two requests

"David R. Morrison" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > 1) Would it be possible to have a "configure" option to use the xpdf libraries
> > already installed on the system?  (We package them already in Fink.)
> 
> It is quite late for that request (the release is planned for this
> weekend). Do you mean that you have libxpdf.a (resp. .so) and libGoo.a
> (resp. so) and the header files installed at standard places? 

Whoops, my mistake.  It seems that the libraries are created when you are
building xpdf, but they are not installed by the Makefiles.  So I withdraw
this request.

> > 2) Would it be possible to include the License statement inside the tarball,
> > instead of separately as in v.1.0?  This would make it much easier for me
> > to document the license within the Fink system.
> 
> That's easier form me to do. Which tarball do you mean (src tarball or
> texmf tarball)?

Well, I personally think the best thing is to include the license statement
in each tarball, so that if somebody encounters this tarball someplace they
can figure out what the license story is with it.

  -- Dave
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.