Re: 2.99.5 release
[email protected] (Frank Küster) Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:39:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Schröder <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2004-12-09 12:29:52 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: >> Compiles fine on SuSE 9.2/x86_64, but I only get 126 binaries: >> [...] >> No etex anymore? Shouldn't pdfetex take the role? Same goes for pdftex. > > And some latex would be nice. :-{ latex never was a binary. It's just a symlink - to tex in 2.0.2, and to pdfetex in 2.99.3. Didn't check 2.99.5 yet, but I'd be surprised if this had changed. Probably etex is also a symlink to pdfetex; pdftex surely is. Only tex should be a separate binary. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer