Re: 2.99.7 ConTeXt, URW-Fonts

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 05:10:53AM +0100, Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
> There is no difference between tx8r.enc and 8r.enc and this is the
> reason tx8r.enc has been removed from teTeX.

This used to be true, but now it is even worse. tx8r.enc and 8r.enc differ
(because 8r.enc was changed and tx8r.enc remained unchanged):

After bringing both into a normalized form, I get:

$ diff tx8r.enc 8r.enc 
24,31c24,31
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
---
> /notequal
> /infinity
> /lessequal
> /greaterequal
> /partialdiff
> /summation
> /product
> /pi
130,131c130,131
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
---
> /Euro
> /integral
143,145c143,145
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
---
> /Omega
> /radical
> /approxequal
159,160c159,160
< /.notdef
< /.notdef
---
> /Delta
> /lozenge

I have no idea if it can have some negative effect if the same encoding
name (TeXBase1Encoding) is loaded with different meanings in one (say
Postscript) document.

Thomas