Re: 2.99.7 ConTeXt, URW-Fonts
Hans Hagen <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:59:32 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Esser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:08:17AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>>i'm getting pretty fed up with such changes; as with other changes
>>(patterns to mention one) such drops/changes are not communicated, and the
>
>
> Don't tell me that you are not reading the tex-fonts mailing list!?
no, i'll have a look at it (after that i need to buy a 3200 by 2400 screen in
order to see my list of mailinglist -)
> Well, if there is a clear separation: no problem. But, the encoding
> name *must* be different, then. Two different implementations of the
> same encoding should not exist.
indeed;
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------