Re: 2.99.8: updmap
Nobuyuki Tsuchimura <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:55:48 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, From: Thomas Esser <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 2.99.8: updmap Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:26:02 +0100 Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > On bash-2.05 it is ok, but on bash-2.05b > > Hm... Two questions. > > What is the output of > type ls > on your two different systems (bash-2.05 / bash-2.05b)? I'm sorry. The problem is this point! [bash-2.05]$ which ls /bin/ls [bash-2.05b]$ which ls alias ls='ls -F --color=auto' ls () { /bin/ls --color=tty ${1+"$@"} } > Does the original script work, if you replace > ls -l $outputFiles | verboseCat > by > \ls -l $outputFiles | verboseCat '\ls' dose same as ever, but '/bin/ls' fixed the problem. It's my linux environment's fault. > That would cause other problems, however. The updmap script is very clean > about whitespace in directory names and not setting IFS would break this. Hmmmm... -- Thanks, Nobuyuki Tsuchimura