Re: Debian teTeX (was: Re: Saving space...)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta
Organization Praesidialbuero der TU Clausthal
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Thomas,

(do I really need the Cc to reach both you you and the list?).

Thomas Esser <[email protected]> writes:

> > I recently ran into the problem, that some CTAN packages like cmbright
> > are not contained in recent DEBIAN packages,  because of their LPPL
> > license, which is considered not to be free in Terms of the DEBIAN
> > guidelines.
> 
> I hope that you misinterpret some information. cmbright was removed even

Maybe, i won't disavove that.

> from teTeX because of the weired license, claiming lppl, but putting

Oh, sorry, I really didn't knew that.

> incompatible restrictions into the license. That was fixed and cmbright
> put back into teTeX (and debian, I think).
> 

O. K.  Let me explain.  I use Debian stable on my server.  Some call
that also Debian rusty :-)  It is sometimes not very actual and
changes in your sources may travel a long time before they appear in a
debian package.  I didn't investigate in that.

I only noticed, that cmbright, which I used in a old TeX file long
ago, was missing and the file didn't compile.

I found via google (debian tetex cmbright) a link, which told me, that
cmbright was removed from the debian packages because of the lppl,
which was considered nonfree.  There was a intensive discussion about
the lppl and why Debian considers it nonfree.

Than (last week) i visited the next CTAN node and downloaded cmbright,
which still is copyrighted under the terms of the lppl.  So I was
mislead to think, that cmbright is still nonfree in terms of Debian
and installed it in the local tree of my system.

Maybe I should install a newer version of teTeX from the testing or
unstable branch?!

If I confused somebody here, I would like to apologise for it.

> People on debian-legal are currently discussion new versions of the lppl,
> so there is hope that the LaTeX team and the debian people can agree on
> a good license for LaTeX and contributed packages.
> 

Fine.  Never give up hope.

Thanks for your explanation.  Greetings to Hannover.

Bye

        Jan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.