Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate

> This is why dvipng.h does not read stdint.h. Am I wrong in following
> this advice?

No, it seems just right not to include stdint.h in dvipng.h. On the
other hand, I wonder why stdint.h should be included in the autoconf
test... That seems wrong to me.

> (Actually, the dvipng distribution uses autoconf 2.5x,
> but tetex does not. And I don't suppose Thomas wants to change this
> close to release.)

Right, I am not going to change this now.

Thomas