Re: Debian teTeX (was: Re: Saving space...)

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 12:08:55PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
>...
> I found via google (debian tetex cmbright) a link, which told me, that
> cmbright was removed from the debian packages because of the lppl,
> which was considered nonfree.  There was a intensive discussion about
> the lppl and why Debian considers it nonfree.
> 
> Than (last week) i visited the next CTAN node and downloaded cmbright,
> which still is copyrighted under the terms of the lppl.  So I was
> mislead to think, that cmbright is still nonfree in terms of Debian
> and installed it in the local tree of my system.
> 
> Maybe I should install a newer version of teTeX from the testing or
> unstable branch?!
> 
> If I confused somebody here, I would like to apologise for it.
>...

The story behind this is that cmbright had a non-free licence (not a
plain LPPL) and after this was discovered it was not only removed from
the Debian package, Thomas removed it from teTeX, too. After the licence
of cmbright was changed it was added back by Thomas to teTeX and it was
available in the Debian packages soon later again, too.

Unfortunately the teTeX packages in Debian stable were prepared in the
time between the date when the non-free-ness was discovered and the date
when the cmbright licence was changed and therefore Debian 3.0 doesn't
contain cmbright.

> Bye
> 
>         Jan

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.