Re: Removal of initex?
Julian Gilbey <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:09:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20051114190918.GF12545@burnside> |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:44:57PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: > > Just a quick question: why is the initex symlink no longer installed? > > To get the format right regarding search paths and array sizes, the > right --progname has to be used. And, even more, the format must be > build with the same engine that runs it (example: a "tex" based initex > will generate an unusable "latex" format, since latex is run with the > pdfetex engine). So by removing "initex", we have removed a common source > of problems. > > People using a tetex based system should use fmtutil for all format > creations to avoid common problems. > > > Unlike virtex, it is described several times in The TeXbook, so is a > > well-known interface, whereas tex -ini is far less so. Any chance of > > reviving this (and the other *ini*) symlinks? > > The initex stuff is marked as system dependent as far as I know. For > the reasons given above, I don't think that web2c or teTeX will revert > the symbolic links for initex. > > Thomas That makes sense, thanks! I'll forward this to the relevant Debian bugs. Julian