Re: tetex rpm's
Sebastian Rahtz <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:26:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Oxford University Computing Services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Richard Cobbe wrote: > Any nontrivial package (and teTeX certainly > qualifies!) has to rely on other packages in the system to satisfy > certain dependency requirements. Therefore, in general, it's going to > be non-trivial to install an .rpm on a Debian system, or a .deb on an > RPM-based system: the two systems do not necessarily provide the same > versions of various libraries, and so forth. This is not necessarily a big deal. TeX is large, but not that complex, and without that many dependencies. It is in general rather self-contained. Yes, you need need the obvious libc stuff, and pdftex needs zlib and libpng, but there isn't a lot else. Obviously, 99% of a TeX system is system independent anyway. Still, there may of course be hidden nasties. -- Sebastian Rahtz Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk