Re: teTeX: no next release

Zdenek Wagner <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, 29 May 2006, [iso-8859-1] Frank K=FCster wrote:
>
>> Furthermore, I think the best thing we got from Thomas is the
>> infrastructure, which has been merged into TeXlive and is still
>> maintained by him there.  Work on selecting and updating CTAN
>> packages, and in creating useful collections, is probably better
>> done within TeXlive, or by making the MikTeX installer work with a
>> preinstalled TeX system.
>>
> I agree. Having rpm's is good just for a group of Redhat based
> systems.

Yes and no.  The most important thing would probably have a _file
list_, or package list.  Whether one generates RPMs or DEBs or
whatever else from such a list would then be a secondary
consideration.

-- =

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum